![]() ![]() Now the good news: the attractiveness bias is easy to spot, so any employer interested in eliminating handicaps against less attractive people cannot just detect this bias, but also evaluate the efficacy of interventions designed to mitigate it.įirst, you measure attractiveness, which is typically a function of consensual ratings of physical appearance – multiple ratings of others’ attractiveness. For instance, in order to join the Chinese Navy “good looks” are an official requirement, and though Abercrombie & Fitch had a $50-million settlement for hiring WASPY looking retail assistants, it was not banned from imposing attractiveness standards in its recruitment policies, so long as the attractive people it recruited were ethnically diverse. Common manifestations of appearance-based discrimination may include bias against obese, oddly-dressed, or tattooed employees, or any individuals who don’t fit a society’s dominant aesthetic criteria.īroadly speaking, the beauty bias concerns the favorable treatment that individuals receive when they are deemed more attractive, regardless of whether this happens consciously or unconsciously – and few individuals, let alone employers, actually admit to preferring to work with others on the basis of their higher levels of attractiveness. ![]() As comprehensive academic review summarized: “Physically attractive individuals are more likely to be interviewed for jobs and hired, they are more likely to advance rapidly in their careers through frequent promotions, and they earn higher wages than unattractive individuals”. The existence of a beauty premium in the labor market is well-documented. Yet one of the most pervasive and prominent biases is hardly ever acknowledged, namely the beauty bias – also known as “lookism”. We have a neat little article on this topic too. However, it’s still quite different Self-Serving Bias. This bias is often the result of a quick judgment, which is where this bias gets its name as a ‘Fundamental Attribution Error’.Īctor-Observer Bias, as the term suggests, talks about the evaluation of actor’s (one’s own) behaviors and observer (someone else’s) behaviors. Actor-Observer Bias is a self-favoring bias, in a way. If we had to explain it all in one paragraph, Fundamental Attribution Error is an attribution bias that discusses our tendency to explain someone’s behaviors on their internal dispositions. This bias differentiates the manner in which we attribute different behaviors.Īs mentioned before, actor-observer bias talks about our tendency to explain someone’s behavior based n the internal factors while explaining our own behaviors on external factors.įor example, if someone trips and falls, we might call them clumsy or careless.On the other hand, if we fell on the exact same spot, we are more likely to blame the ground for being uneven. On the other hand, Actor-Observer Bias covers both attributions of others’ and one’s own behaviors. One’s own behaviors are irrelevant in this case.įor example, if someone trips and falls, we might call them clumsy or careless. The major difference lies between these two biases in the parties they cover.įundamental Attribution Error is strictly about attribution of others’ behaviors. Differences Between Fundamental Attribution Error and Actor-Observer Bias Various studies have indicated that both fundamental attribution error and actor-observer bias is more prevalent when the outcomes are negative. In both cases, others’ behaviors are blamed on their internal dispositions or their personality.Īnother similarity here is the manner in which the disposition takes place. The first similarity we can point is that both these biases focus on the attributions for others’ behaviors. But, before we dive into separating them apart, let’s look at few obvious similarities. These biases seem quite similar and yet there are few clear differences. Similarities Between Fundamental Attribution Error and Actor-Observer Bias It talks about the difference in perspective due to our habitual need to prioritize ourselves. The Actor-Observer bias is best explained as a tendency to attribute other people’s behavior to internal causes while attributing our own actions to external causes.Īctor-Observer bias discusses attributions for others’ behaviors as well as our own behaviors. Read more about Fundamental Attribution Error. It is strictly about attributions for others’ behaviors. So, fundamental attribution error is only focused on other people’s behavior.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |